Thursday, March 10, 2022

 FRANZ FANON AND SOUTH ASIA

Paper No. 6770                   Dated 26- Mar-2021

By Kazi Anwarul Masud:


 Frantz Fanon a Marxist who had joined the Algerian independence war
wrote about the prejudice of, what he called, the "colonial alienation
of the person" as a mental health issue.        In The Wretched of the
Earth (French: Les Damnés de la Terre), published in 1961, Fanon
analyzed how French colonization and the carnage of the Algerian War
had mentally affected Algerians' self-identity and mental health.
Fanon argued that the colonial psyche was fractured by the lack of
mental and material homogeneity as a result of the colonial power's
Western culture being pressured onto the colonized population despite
the existing material differences between them.                During
the period of European colonial rule in India, Europeans in India
typically regarded many aspects of Indian culture with disdain and
supported the colonial rule as a beneficial "civilizing mission
beneficial to the people of India, rather than a process of political
and economic dominance by a small minority of foreigners.  Albeit
under colonial rule, many practices were outlawed, such as the
practice of forcing widows to immolate themselves (known as sati).
Colonel Sir William Sleeman when Lord William Bentinck was
Governor-General of India was instrumental in suppressing the Thugs
who idolized Maa Kali and used to rob people of their belongings. The
practice and was discouraged by Evangelical missionaries claimed by
some scholars to have played a significant role in the development of
the modern definition of Hinduism. These claims based their
assumptions on the lack of a unified Hindu identity prior to the
period of colonial rule.      Hindu nationalism developed in the 19th
century as an internalization of European ideological prominence; with
local Indian elites aiming to make themselves and Indian society
modern by "emulating the West". This led to the emergence of what some
have termed 'neo-Hinduism': consisting of reformist rhetoric
transforming Hindu tradition from above, disguised as a revivalist
call to return to the traditional practices of the faith. Reflecting
the same arguments made by Christian missionaries, who argued that the
more superstitious elements of Hindu practice were responsible for
corrupting the potential rational philosophy of the faith. Some
critics have claimed that Rudyard Kipling's portrayals of Indian
characters supported the view that colonized people were incapable of
living without the help of Europeans as racist. In his famous poem
"The White Man's Burden", Kipling argued for this point by
romanticizing the "civilizing mission" in non-Western countries.
Similar sentiments appeared in Kipling's other works, such as his
characterization of the Second Boer War as a "white man's war" along
with his presentation of 'whiteness' as a morally and culturally
superior trait of the West. His portrayal of Indians in his Jungle
Book stories has also been criticized as example of the chauvinistic
infantilization of colonized peoples in popular culture. Some
historians claim that Kipling's works have contributed towards the
development of a colonial mentality in the ways that the colonized
people in these fictional narratives are made submissive to and
dependent on their white rulers.  Individuals of Indian descent who
adopt European culture have sometimes been labeled as "Macaulay's
Children". The term usually used in a derogatory fashion derived from
19th-century historian, politician, and colonial administrator Thomas
Macaulay, who instituted the system of Macaulayism, replacing Indian
languages and dialects with English as the official medium of
instruction in Indian educational institutions. The consequences of
this educational policy can still be felt in present-day India, where
the use of English, as opposed to Hindi, still carries with it a level
of superiority. Nationalist politicians have campaigned and pushed
forward policy changes to promote the official usage of Hindi in
education and media over English, which was protested against in the
south of India as the imposition of Hindi upon non-Hindi speakers.
Contrarily      Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness narrates through
Marlow’s story that Darkness takes place in the Belgian Congo, the
most notorious European colony in Africa because of the Belgian
colonizers' immense greed and brutal treatment of the native people.
In its depiction of the monstrous wastefulness and casual cruelty of
the colonial agents toward the African native's Heart of Darkness
reveals the utter hypocrisy of the entire colonial rule.  In Europe,
colonization of Africa was justified on the grounds that not only
would it bring wealth to Europe, it would also civilize and educate
the "savage” natives. Heart of Darkness shows that in practice the
European colonizers used the high ideals of colonization as a cover to
allow them to viciously rip whatever wealth they could from “savages”
who remained to be “civilized”.       Unlike most novels that focus on
the evils of colonialism, Heart of Darkness pays more attention to the
damage that colonization does to the souls of white colonizers than it
does to the physical death and devastation unleashed on the black
natives. Though this focus on the white colonizers makes the book
somewhat unbalanced, it does allow Heart of Darkness to extend its
criticism of colonialism all the way back to its corrupt source, the
"civilization" of Europe.  Allied is the term
“American imperialism”  that refers to the economic, military, and
cultural influence of the United States internationally     American
imperialism is partly based on American exceptionalism, the idea that
the United States is different from other countries because of its
specific world mission to spread liberty and democracy.      One of
the most notable instances of American imperialism was the annexation
of Hawaii in 1898, which allowed the United States to gain possession
and control of all ports, buildings, harbors, military equipment, and
public property that had belonged to the Government of the Hawaiian
Islands.      Some groups, such as the American Anti-Imperialist
League, opposed imperialism on the grounds that it conflicted with the
American ideal of Republicans and the “consent of the governed.” Then
came the use of the term:           Social Darwinism, an ideology that
seeks to apply biological concepts of Darwinism or evolutionary theory
to sociology and politics, often under the assumption that conflict
between social groups leads to social progress, as superior groups
surpass inferior ones. Also popular was the term      “American
Exceptionalism”-a  belief, central to American political culture since
the Revolution, that Americans have a unique mission among nations to
spread freedom and democracy. Close by was the term         “ American
Imperialism” which referred to the economic, military, and cultural
influence of the United States on other countries.      Expansion and
Power and to the economic, military, and cultural influence of the
United States on other countries.  The advent of industrialization
caused American businessmen to seek new international markets in which
to sell their goods. In addition, the increasing influence of social
Darwinism led to the belief that the United States was inherently
responsible for bringing concepts such as industry, democracy, and
Christianity to less developed “savage” societies. The combination of
these attitudes and other factors led the United States toward
imperialism    American imperialism is partly rooted in American
exceptionalism, the idea that the United States is different from
other countries due to its specific world mission to spread liberty
and democracy. This theory often is traced back to the words of 1800s
French observer Alexis de Tocqueville, who concluded that the United
States was a unique nation, “proceeding along a path to which no limit
can be perceived.”      Pinpointing the actual beginning of American
imperialism is difficult. Some historians suggest that it began with
the writing of the Constitution; some would like to trace the imperial
behavior of the United States to the Louisiana Purchase. Critics
describe this event as an, “aggressive encroachment of one people upon
the territory of another, resulting in the subjugation of that people
to alien rule.” They refer to the U.S. policies toward Native
Americans, as “designed to remold them into a people more
appropriately conformed to imperial desires.”
Whatever its origins, American imperialism experienced its pinnacle
from the late 1800s through the years following World War II. During
this “Age of Imperialism,” the United States exerted political,
social, and economic control over countries such as the Philippines,
Cuba, Germany, Austria, Korea, and Japan. One of the most notable
examples of American imperialism in this age was the annexation of
Hawaii in 1898, which allowed the United States to gain possession and
control of all ports, buildings, harbors, military equipment, and
public property that had formally belonged to the Government of the
Hawaiian Islands. This action resulted in Hawaii’s becoming America’s
50th state in 1959.          The American Anti-Imperialist League
opposed the annexation on the ground that imperialism violated the
credo of republicanism, especially the need for “consent of the
governed.” They did not oppose expansion on commercial,
constitutional, religious, or humanitarian grounds; rather, they
believed that the annexation and administration of third-world
tropical areas would mean the abandonment of American ideals of
self-government and isolation—ideals expressed in the U.S. Declaration
of Independence, George Washington‘s Farewell Address, and Abraham
Lincoln‘s Gettysburg Address.  The Spanish-American War was the result
of American intervention in the ongoing Cuban War of Independence with
Spain.      The war served to further repair relations between the
American North and South. The war gave both sides a common enemy for
the first time since the end of the Civil War in 1865, and many
friendships were formed between soldiers of Northern and Southern
states during their tours of duty.      The war marked American entry
into world affairs. Since then, the United States has had a
significant hand in various conflicts around the world. An example was
the        Treaty of Paris, negotiated on terms favorable to the
United States. The Spanish-American War marked American entry into
world affairs. Before the Spanish-American War, the United States was
characterized by isolationism, an approach to foreign policy that
asserts that a nation’s interests are best served by keeping the
affairs of other countries at a distance. Since the Spanish-American
War, the United States has had a significant hand in various conflicts
around the world.  The war redefined national identity, served as a
solution of sorts to the social divisions plaguing the American mind,
and provided a model for all future news reporting. Joseph Conrad in
his book            Heart of Darkness expresses his skepticism about
imperialism. Set in Central       Africa Conrad and presents “a
ruthlessly ironic view of European colonialism and the pretension of
civilization” The narrative fully developed in Heart of Darkness, the
plot of which is set in       Africa offers an exceptionally ironic
view of European imperialism and trading practices.        According
to some a partial explanation of Conrad’s skepticism about imperialism
is to be found in his Polish upbringing. After experiencing the
partition of his home country between Russia, Prussia and Austria,
Conrad had a good reason to question the right of great powers to
submit smaller countries to their will. Another answer lies in the
fact that Conrad had himself traveled in Africa where he experienced
the “rapacity and brutality of Europeans” exploiting the Continent. It
is no surprise that criticism of the European civilization appears in
Heart of       Darkness where again the impact of individuals isolated
from their social system shows the inability of European civilization
to protect its individuals from corruption.      In much of his, work
Conrad expresses his skepticism about imperialism. For example, “An
Outpost of Progress” is set in Central       Africa and presents “a
ruthlessly ironic view of European colonialism and the pretension of
civilization” After experiencing the partition of his home country
between Russia, Prussia, and Austria, Conrad had a good reason to
question the right of great powers to submit smaller countries to
their will. Another answer lies in the fact that Conrad had himself
traveled in Africa where he experienced the “rapacity and brutality of
Europeans” exploiting the Continent.       Criticism of the European
civilization appears in “An Outpost of Progress”     when the
characters, isolated from the conventions and institutions of their
‘civilized’       world, reveal the hollowness that lies at its core.
This theme reappears in Heart of       Darkness where again the impact
of individuals isolated from their social system shows the inability
of European civilization to protect its individuals from corruption.
  The relevance of Conrad’s Heart of Darkness to the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries is apparent in the allusions to the story in
media and in culture in general.    Can one then argue that Conrad was
not far from his central premise that the British who had come to
India for trading managed to stay on because the Mughals failed to
understand the British concept of grasping political power from a
fragmented majority Hindu population? The final nail in the coffin was
 put by Emperor Aurangajeb by his foolish taxation policy imposed on
the majority yet fragmented Hindu populace.