DELVING
DEEP INTO MUMBAI MASSACRE
By Kazi
Anwarul Masud (former Secretary and ambassador of Bangladesh)
One wonders whether the mindless massacre in
Mumbai of late November reflects for Pakistan a
passage towards becoming a failed state as the entire country is
seemingly not under the control of the
government--- one of the signs of a failed state—or a refusal by the military
to ignore civilian control and thereby weakening the nascent democracy in
Pakistan or a continuation of hate-India syndrome that has been the raison
d’etre of Pakistan’s creation and existence as a state or a reflection of
al-Qaeda/Lashkar-e-Toiba’s belief of “US-Jewish-Indian alliance against
Muslims. Though the Western colonization
process was not specifically targeted against the Muslims because the “white
men’s burden”—of civilizing the uncivilized—had universal coverage of “duty” to
the Westerners, the conflict between the two
religions and cultures-Islam and Christianity- continued through out
with the passage of time. Each was convinced
of the moral superiority of its teachings. Proponents of the dueling
civilizations found prescience in historian Bernard Lewis’ observation dating
back to the nineties that the world has a “clash of civilizations”—Islamic vs.
Christians and post-Christians; rigid theocratic hierarchy vs. permissive
secular modernism—charged with as Lewis perceived the Muslim world’s “downward
spiral of hate and spite, rage and self-pity; poverty and oppression”. It has
been argued that the Muslim world is horrified by the fundamental debasement
and moral corruption in Western society, the West’s tolerance of every sort of
decadence fuelling Islamic contempt of a dissolute culture that effectively
could be termed as a dereliction of duty by the church. This wavering and
tenuous belief in Christianity by modern day Westerners, it has been argued,
resulted in the simultaneous assault by the followers of Marx and Freud – one
contending that evil springs from unjust social conditions created by unfair
political systems while the other saw it as a product of psychological
dysfunction. The strict adherence of Christian belief would disregard both
contentions and lay the blame on endemic human nature—the doctrine of original
sin. They further claim that atheism and radical secularism are denial of
essential human spirituality and that both Christianity and Islam claim
exclusive universal moral sovereignty. Of late the term “Islamic
fundamentalism” has gained global currency though as Professor John Esposito
has noted on several occasions that the term “fundamentalism” originated in
Christianity and can be misleading if used in equal measure for Saudi Arabia, Libya or Iran who have
entirely divergent political systems. He
sees in the resurgence of Islam deep malaise typified by widespread feeling of
failure and loss of self-esteem, failed political system and stagnant
economies. Stephen Zunes of the University
of San Francisco goes
further and lays the blame squarely on US policy towards political Islam
(Foreign Policy in Focus—June 2001). He identified problems of current US
policy being US support of hardliner repressive Islamic regimes making
democratic and non-violent opposition as a nonviable option; US tolerance of
“democratic exceptions” in many Islamic countries on grounds of vital national
interests and in the process perpetuating unfair distribution of wealth in
those societies; and perhaps the cardinal sin of US policy is its totally one
sided support of Israel in the Arab Israel dispute. Middle
East road map is not seen by many as implementable or reflection
of US
equidistant policy in the Palestinian dispute.
As Stephen Zunes keeps on reminding us of the fact that from the time of
the crusades through European colonization and the Iraq war western Christians
killed far more Muslims than has been the case in reverse and the Muslims have
a very strong sense of this historical fact. Additionally had the Americans not
been instrumental in the overthrow of popular Iranian Prime Minister Dr.
Mohammed Mosadegh and replacing him with Reza Shah Pahlvi then Ayatollah
Khomeini’s triumphant return to Iran
at the head of the Iranian Revolution would not have happened. One must
remember that many Muslims retain a strong historical sense of the Anglo-French
colonization of the Muslim countries that assaulted not only Islamic religion
and culture but also caused the death of a million Algerians in their fight for
independence from France.
Despite Tony Blair’s claim that NATO forces fought for the Bosnian and the
Kosovar Muslims against Christian Serbs it has been alleged that the massacre
at Srebrenica could have been avoided but for NATO delayed decision that
perhaps was occasioned because the victims were Muslims. Francis Fukuyama (of
The End of History and The Last Man fame) seems to concede that nine-eleven
events might have strengthened Samuel Huntington’s premise (The Clash of
Civilizations and Remaking of the World Order) that instead of progressing
towards a single world order the world could be faced with several cultural
groups and thereby produce fresh fault lines for global conflict. Fukuyama is also
intrigued by Huntington’s
central question: whether institutions of modernity like democracy and
capitalism are peculiar to the West or have a broader appeal. Though the
modernity institutions are doing well in East Asia, South Asia, Latin America,
and Africa; most of the Islamic countries suffer from democracy deficit and
none of the Islamic countries have made successful transition from a developing
country to a developed country like Singapore or South Korea.
Despite universal condemnation of terrorism in
ant form questions have been raised whether radical Islam can constitute a
serious alternative to Western liberal democracy .One would wish it not to be
so. For example despite the chaos that envelops Afghanistan most of the people seem
relieved at being freed from the Taliban Caligula. In case of the Iranians after more than two
decades of clerical rule it is generally believed that the youth who constitute
the majority of the Iranian population would like to live in a freer and more
liberal society. Ivan Elad of Cato
Institute (Does US intervention overseas breed terrorism—December 1998) reached
the conclusion that large number of terrorist attacks that occurred in retaliation
of an interventionist American foreign policy implicitly demonstrated that
terrorism against US targets could be significantly reduced if the US adopted a
policy of military restraint overseas.
But would it necessarily be so? Jessica Stern of
Harvard University advises the West to spend on health, education and economic
development to prevent the rise of Osama bin Ladens. Former Turkish President
Suleyman Demirel feels that fundamentalist forces draw sustenance from poverty,
inequality, injustice and repressive political system. President Clinton held
the view that forces of reaction fed on disillusionment, poverty and despair.
But empirical study on Islamists and terrorists found them to belong
“significantly above the average in their generation”. It has been said that
like Fascism and Marxism-Leninism in their heydays, militant Islam attracts
highly competent, motivated and ambitious individuals. So if militant Islam is
not a function of poverty and as Birthe Hansen of Copenhagen University puts it
that the spread of free market, capitalism and liberal democracy is probably an
important factor in the rise of political Islam; the West may have to look for
a solution less confrontational and more based on diplomatic and, when
necessary, economic engagements.
In the case of Mumbai massacre India by the
laws governing war would be entitled to its pound of flesh for the barbarity
inflicted upon the innocent people and the long term economic loss that the
financial capital of India
stands to incur. But given the volatile history of Pakistan and the accommodative
gestures by President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani it would be
advisable for India
to exercise restraint and prevent the conflagration that is looming in the
horizon of South Asia.
No comments:
Post a Comment